Showing posts with label Patrick Kane. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Patrick Kane. Show all posts

Wednesday, October 6, 2010

My Enormous Crystal Balls: The 2010-11 NHL Season



By Hockey Guru


The Sports Talk Pool is proud to publish it annual edition of predictions about the 2010-11 season.

The last thing we saw in the 2009-2010 hockey season,





was Patty Kane scoring the Stanley Cup winning goal in OT (didn't we all do that on the pond, or in the driveway, once or twice, growing up).

The 'Hawks proved to be the class of the league and really weren't tested. The biggest test they faced was the salary cap, once the season ended.

So what's in store for 2010-2011? Let's look into the enormous crystal ball and see. Using my patented Guru's Giv'er 800%™ method for determining each team's playoff odds:


Eastern Conference

Washington Capitals 100%
New Jersey Devils 95%
Pittsburgh Penguins 90%
Philadelphia Flyers 80%
Buffalo Sabres 70%
Boston Bruins 70%
Ottawa Senators 50%
New York Rangers 50%
Tampa Bay Lightning 49%
Atlanta Thrashers 40%
New York Islanders 40%
Montreal Canadiens 30%
Toronto Maple Leafs 25%
Florida Panthers 10%
Carolina Hurricanes 1%


Western Conference

Chicago Blackhawks 100%
San Jose Sharks 100%
Vancouver Canucks 100%
Detroit Red Wings 90%
Los Angeles Kings 70%
Phoenix Coyotes 60%
St.Louis Blues 55%
Colorado Avalanche 45%
Columbus Blue Jackets 45%
Nashville Predators 30%
Anaheim Ducks 30%
Calgary Flames 30%
Edmonton Oilers 25%
Dallas Stars 15%
Minnesota Wild 5%


Conference Finals

Pittsburgh vs. Washington
Chicago vs. San Jose


Stanley Cup Finals

San Jose over Washington


Okay, not my best work. For some reason, the start to this season is just not capturing my full attention. The enormous crystal ball has been gathering dust for months. It's late, and the millions of visitors to this site demand a prediction, so there it is.



Friday, May 28, 2010

Carnac the Guru: Talk About Predictable Outcomes



By Hockey Guru


Maybe the forecast of a Philadelphia and Chicago Stanley Cup Final was predictable as far back as last September, but the paths the two teams took to arrive here certainly were enjoyable and anything but predictable. [Editor's Note: I disagree on that last point, since I actually did predict almost the exact road - that the Blackhawks would come out of the 2nd seed, and that the Flyers would come out of the 8th seed]

The latest Cardiac Kids - these Philadelphia Flyers - may be the poster child for the latest wave of 0-3 series comebacks, but Chicago seems to be a well-oiled machine, destined to hoist the Cup in the next two weeks. What does the Guru's crystal ball foresee?

The data going in shows that the Hawks defeated Nashville, Vancouver and San Jose en route to their SCF appearance. Meanwhile the Flyers eliminated New Jersey, Boston and Montreal to arrive on the grand stage.

According to the Crystal Ball - San Jose and Vancouver would come out on top of each of the teams eliminated by Philadelphia - going a combined 6-0 in those matchups (the closest being New Jersey-Vancouver which would have gone 7 games).

This matchup, at first glance would appear to be a BCS school vs non-BCS school in a National Championship game. Sure, it would be a great story for Boise State to knock of Alabama - but realisticly - it's just not going to happen.

However, on the ice, one thing that can not be overlooked is the parity in the NHL. The fact that the Flyers only made it to the playoffs following a shoot-out victory is proof enough. The Flyers are mentally tough - as coming back from an 0-3 hole proves - and they have a deep and talented team.

The Hawks had their hands full with Nashville. 6'5" Goaltender Pekka Rinne and the great-skating defense of Nashville caused a lot of concern and with a couple bounces - the Hawks were nearly bounced from the play-offs. (Well by nearly, they weren't even pushed to an elimination game).

The Hawks were built and designed to overcome the Detroit Red Wings machine - one which "invented" the left-wing lock which is employed by Philadelphia. The Hawks will be soaring and will break through against Philadelphia much the way they did against San Jose and Vancouver. They will be able to raise their game when needed to win.

The series prediction from the Guru is the Hawks in 5 games.

Game One prediction: Fast, physical first period. Hawks scoring at least one PP goal and leading 2-0 or 2-1 after the first. Game settling down a bit in the second, but another Hawks "victory" in the second period with the Hawks wrapping up Game One with a decisive 6-3 victory.


[Update: It's currently 7:19 PM ET on Saturday, May 29th, or about an hour before puck drop for Game One.]


The 2010 Stanley Cup Playoffs has been unpredictable - although the Hockey Guru has been right much more often than not - the Hockey Guru, himself has proven to be unpredictable.

Tonight marks the first 180-degree turn around on a prediction - prior to anything else changing.

The Guru contemplated the prediction of the Hawks in five - and one thing kept coming back to him - this is a series of men against boys.

Jonathan Toews and Patrick Kane are boys. They say the right things - but they really don't believe that this may be their only chance at a Stanley Cup. The Flyers have more veterans - more career players that will be leaving everything they have on the ice. The Flyers have a great coach and this series will be much more difficult than the original Hawks in Five prediction.

The depth of the Flyers is probably more impressive than the depth of the Hawks (particularly if going on merit and not reputation). Marian Hossa hasn't produced yet - what would make the crystal ball predict otherwise? The Flyers will get the jump on the series tonight and might even get up 2-0. Chicago will not be swept (although there are some experts that have consulted with the Guru with just that predictiion)!

The Guru is not quite prepared to change the series pick from Chicago - just he believes that Chicago will have to step up their game in this series and have little to no margin for error.

The way this first game unfolds may be as telling as game one in the Eastern Conference Finals or may leave the Guru continuing to be on the fence.

Tonight's revised Game One prediction: Philadelphia 4 - Chicago 3



Friday, December 4, 2009

The All-Time Teams: The Olympics' Team U.S.A.



By Will-He-M

It may be a little generous of me to give the Americans the All-Time Olympic Bronze, but those two Miracles On Ice do leave a lasting impression, especially when portrayed by Kurt Russell.



Coach- Herb Brooks
GM- Brian Burke


Line 1

LW- Joe Mullen
C- Mike Modano
RW- Pat LaFontaine


Line 2

LW- John LeClair
C- Doug Weight
RW- Brett Hull


Line 3

LW- Keith Tkachuk
C- Jeremy Roenick
RW- Tony Amonte


Line 4

LW- Dave Christian
C- Neal Broten
RW- Bill Guerin


Def. Pair 1

RD- Rod Langway
LD- Brian Leetch


Def. Pair 2

RD- Mark Howe
LD- Phil Housley


Def. Pair 3

RD- Chris Chelios
LD- Gary Suter


Goalies

1- Frank Brimsek
2- Tom Barrasso
3- John Vanbiesbrouck


Taxi Squad

1- Ken Morrow- D
2- Mathieu Schneider- D
3- Patrick Kane- RW
4- Mike Ramsey- D
5- Zach Parise- LW



Line 1

This line would be scary quick. All 3 players have the unique ability to pass, shoot and dangle and are just as good at those abilitie as an Canadian.


Line 2

This line is nearly perfect but unfortunately, the USA has yet to deliver an elite playmaker ala Gretzky or Lemieux. Still though, near perfection is still going to give team's nightmares. I originally had JR on here but figured Weight's passing ability would take advantage of the 2 best US snipers ever.


Line 3

A fairly gritty line, no star defensive player but all 3 have the ability to play in their own end and cause trouble for opposition forwards.


Line 4
Again, no star defensive forward but still 3 guys who are well above average defensively.


Def. Pair 1

The perfect combination of offense and defence, Langway's sound defensive game would perfectly compliment Leetch's offensive game


Def. Pair 2

I'd like to officially change my pairings, here I would have Housley with CRAIG LUDWIG, same reasoning as above.


Def. Pair 3

And I'd move Mark Howe here with Chris Chelios. This would be the Top Pair on most countries teams but this shows the depth Team USA has on defence.


Goalies

Anyone nicknamed "Mr. Zero" has to be a starter. Barrasso would be the perfect back up with Beezer being one of the better 3rd stringers ever.


Taxi Squad

The only problem with Team USA is their lack of depth up front, forcing me to choose 2 relatively unproven players in Kane and Parise. Don't get me wrong, when all is said and done, Kane and Parise could very well be Top 5 best US forwards ever.